![]() Like its predecessors, Stilo emphasis differentiation between 3-door and 5-door versions. The 3-door is an immediate darling to eyes, thanks to sporty profile and elegant taillights. The 5-door looks rather conservative but still prettier than Japanese alternatives. Mechanically speaking, the 5-door is the more practical one. Having a MPV profile, it is taller than the 3-door by a full 50mm, thus enabling higher sitting position yet preserve more headroom. In fact, it is even taller than Peugeot 307, the tallest car in class up to now. The 5-door also boost more luggage space because its rear overhang is 66mm longer.
The
plastic and assembly quality of interior is greatly improved, though
not
matching Volkswagen and Peugeot 307. But this is already very unusual
for
Fiat. On the other hand, equipment level exceeds Japanese level, thanks
to the adoption of Alfa 147's "Connect" system which incorporates
satellite
navigation, phone, internet access, MP3 player and voice recognition
control.
It also offers cruise control, keyless entry and starting
The chassis is an innovation for mass production - spaceframe floorpan welded with steel monocoque upper body. It doesn't use full-spaceframe as if Multipla (Fiat's first spaceframe car) because monocoque body will be significantly cheaper to build in larger amount. On the other hand, spaceframe floorpan is highly flexible, allowing deviations in wheelbase, width and mechanical strength out of the same production tooling. While this might not benefit the Stilo duo which have identical wheelbase, the forthcoming Stilo MPV will enjoy longer wheelbase. Expect a 7-seat layout. In the suspension department, like Punto, Fiat replaced traditional trailing arm rear suspensions with fashionable torsion-beam axle in order to reduce unsprung weight and increase suspension travel.
Both 1.6 and 1.8 are just average in terms of performance and refinement. Even the Abarth 3-door with so much c.c. is no pocket rocket, blame to the kerb weight of 1265kg (1320kg for the 5-door) and somewhat the use of Selespeed gearbox instead of pure manual. However, the balance-shafted 5-cylinder engine is spirited to spin and wonderful to ears, while the Selespeed - with new improvement to shift quality - is smoother than Alfa 147. The extra 400c.c. over rival hot hatches means the Abarth Stilo feels torquey and mature. Just don't call it hot hatch. Despite of the "Abarth" label, no Stilo is designed to take on Ford Focus. In fact, the suspension setting bias towards the soft side, softer than most European especially German hatches, and something approaching the softness of Japanese cars. This is a big contrast to Brava/o's harshness. The Stilo rides smoothly over surface irregularities, and it damps pretty well. It is just caught out by mid-corner bumps and large ruts and expansion joints. Turn into a corner, it rolls quite a lot initially and then settle. Push harder, it understeers gently and progressively. Back off mid-corner, it remains stable and does not oversteer. It possesses the qualities a matured and refined family car should have. However, that also means it is not a driver's car. Its chassis and suspensions lack the sharpness to inspire driving excitement. For example, it does not change direction as eager as Focus. It does not throttle-steer. Worst of all, the electric power steering is vague and feels artificial. However, I think Fiat is right this time. The success of Golf and Corolla proves that few car buyers care about first-rate handling. The Stilo rates high in every aspect other than handling. It feels substantial. It feels matured, It feels more expensive than the Fiat logo suggest. In other words, it can earn Fiat more profits than the cheap Punto, Palio and Panda. The
best Stilo is 3-door Abarth and 5-door 1.9JTD. Fiat's common-rail turbo
diesel is torquey and quite refined, suiting the character of the car.
The 3-door Abarth is also attractive, combining stylish look,
characterful
engine, a refined packaging and sophisticated equipment means
Volkswagen
Golf V5 might have to cut price for competition.
|
The above report was last updated on 26 Sep 2001. All Rights Reserved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|